Estimating and Reporting Avoided Emissions
There is considerable interest among companies in claiming that their products can help avoid greenhouse gas emissions compared to other products in the marketplace. While it’s true that the use of some products can help to avoid GHG emissions, accurately measuring a product’s impact—whether positive or negative—can be challenging.
This paper outlines a neutral framework for estimating and disclosing both positive and negative impacts of products and provides recommendations for companies to improve the credibility and consistency of their claims.
What is the purpose of this paper?
Using a review of current practices in comparative assessments, this paper identifies major accounting issues, evaluates the credibility of existing practices, and outlines general principles and good practices to guide future accounting efforts.
These recommendations are not intended to serve as exhaustive or detailed guidance. The scope of the analysis and recommendations is global, covering all geographic regions and sectors.
Who should read this paper?
This paper is primarily intended for companies interested in estimating and reporting the comparative greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts of their products. It should also be used by industry associations as a basis for developing sector-specific accounting and reporting guidance. Additionally, investors, environmental groups, policymakers, and academics can use this paper to learn about best practices for estimating and disclosing comparative GHG impacts.
Related News
GLEC Framework: a universal method for logistics emissions accounting
This week, the Smart Freight Center released the GLEC Framework, a guide for shippers, carriers and logistics service providers on how to report emissions from logistics operations. It is meant to be used in conjunction with the Corporate Standard, and it has earned the “Built on GHG Protocol” mark for its compliance with GHG Protocol’s requirements.
You, too, can master value chain emissions
For many businesses, value chain (scope 3) emissions account for more than 70 percent of their carbon footprint. Measuring and managing these emissions can motivate a company to do business with greener suppliers, improve the energy efficiency of its products, and rethink its distribution network -- measures that significantly reduce the overall impact on the climate.
Top Ten Questions about the Scope 2 Guidance
On January 20, the GHG Protocol released the Scope 2 Guidance: an amendment to the Corporate Standard. It is the first major revision to the Corporate Standard in over 11 years. To help companies start implementing the Guidance, here are a few answers to the top ten questions you might have and where to find more information in the Guidance document.